|
RICHARD
M. COLOMBIK
JD, CPA
RICHARD M. COLOMBIK
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
FAMILY
LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
Family
Limited Partnerships, hereinafter ?FLP? are a special type of limited
partnership, that can be used in conjunction with an estate plan,
an asset protection plan, as well as a financial plan.
What
is this wondrous vehicle and how does it work? The purpose of
this article will be to address these concerns.
FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
A
FLP, is a limited partnership, composed of family members. A limited
partnership is filed pursuant to the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership
Act. By executing and filing a certificate of limited partnership,
a limited partnership, under Illinois law, comes into being.
A
certificate of limited partnership has nine enumerated requisites pursuant
to 805 ILC2 210/201 including:
5.
The value of property contributed to or agreed to be contributed
to the partnership.
The
essence of a limited partnership is the creation of two classes of partners,
the general partner, the one that control the entity, and the limited
partners, the ones who have no voice in any management decisions.
Therefore, the general partner runs the show, and the limited partner
sits by the sidelines. These are a variant of the misguided entities
used with tax shelter transactions.
Parents
or older family members, the ones with more assets, initially are
general partners, as well as the majority limited partners. Children
or younger generation family members would have very small interest
initially as limited partners. They could annually be gifted additional
limited partnership interests subject to the annual gift tax exclusion,
currently $10,000.00 per person. Since all partners would
be related, the term, FLP, is used to refer to this entity.
WHAT DOES
IT DO?
A
limited partnership has three major advantages relating to estate planning
and asset protection:
1.
Separation of Ownership
A FLP allows a division between who
owns the property, and who controls it. For example, if the general
partner, parents, only own 1% interest in a FLP, and the children own
a 99% interest as limited partners, the parents, general partners, control
all assets. It is important to remember limited partnership law,
the general partner runs the show. Limited partners, not only have limits
on liability, but have no right to participate in FLP business affairs.
New revenue rulings, concede that owning
less than the whole asset, means that parts of the asset are not worth
as much. For example, if you tried to sell someone 20% of your
house, there would probably be very few outside takers. Another
example would be selling 20% of a car. Again, not too many takers.
The IRS has recently adopted the same
position relative to family members. Even if a family in the aggregate
owns 100% of an asset, a discount is available to each owner, if each
individual member does not own 100% of the asset. In Revenue Ruling
93-12, 1993-7 IRB 13, a parent transferred 100% of the shares in a closely
held corporation, 20% each, to his five children. In the aggregate,
his children therefore owned 100% of the corporation. Prior to
the ruling in question, the IRS would use attribution rules and allege
that each of the five children constructively owned 100% of the stock.
This would, therefore, not allow for a minority discount to be applied
to any child?s interest.
In Revenue Ruling 93-12, the IRS changed
its position and now allows each minority interest of a child to be
valued as a minority interest, and not aggregated. Therefore,
an appropriate discount to valuation, somewhere between 15 to
22% may be present relative to each interest in the partnership.
Additional restrictions on transfer of an interest could increase the
discount to 30 or 40%. Thus, a one million dollar valued property,
might only be worth seven hundred thousand if each 20% interest was
entitled to a 30 % discount, by usage of a FLP. This can result
in big estate tax savings, considering estate tax ranges from
a minimum of 37% up to a maximum of 55%.
An additional aspect of a FLP is asset
protection. In a properly structured limited partnership, a creditor,
who obtains a judgment against any partner, may not attach partnership
property. Instead, a creditor may obtain a ?charging order?
against the partnership interest. The charging order does not
allow the creditor to attach partnership property, nor does
it allow the creditor to become a partner, or to liquidate the interest,
if the FLP is properly drafted. Instead the creditor obtains
the profit or loss from the partnership interest it attaches to.
The answer is found in Revenue Ruling
77-137. In Revenue Ruling 77-137, the individual at issue obtained
an assignment of a limited partnership interest. The IRS ruled
that the assigned partner must report the distributive share of partnership
items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit attributable to the
assigned interest just as if the person was a substituted limited partner.
This was notwithstanding the fact that no money was distributed from
the partnership, yet taxable income had to be included on the judgment
creditor?s income tax return. Therefore, you could cause a judgment
creditor to pay income tax on money they would not receive. This
makes a charging order highly ineffective and quite costly.
Therefore,
the three elements as discussed above, valuation discounts, separation
of ownership, combined with asset protection, makes a FLP an ideal
vehicle to hold liquid assets, as well as other assets in your estate
plan.
Remember,
a FLP, is only one tool to be used in conjunction with your overall
estate plan, asset protection plan and financial plan.
Richard
M. Colombik, JD, CPA, is the principal in the law firm of Richard M.
Colombik & Associates, P.C., and serves as chairman of the Federal
Taxation Council. He is an elected representative in the Illinois
State Bar Association Assembly, and also serves as liaison to the IRS
district director for the Illinois State Bar Association. He can
be reached at 630-250-5700.
|