|
EXPERIENCE
MAGAZINE
You Figure
It Out!
By: Richard
M. Colombik, JD, CPA
As I write
this version of an investment report I have just finished reviewing
four economists viewpoints and, just like four experienced attorneys
they all have logical yet different conclusions. The Dow Jones
Industrial Average on May 28, 2003 closed at a tad under 8800 the NASDAQ
Composite at 1563 and the S & P 500 at 953. Year to date the
Dow Jones Industrial is up at a whopping 2.16% whereas the NASDAQ is
up 12.88%, a respectable gain. Yet, for the last year the Dow
is cumulatively down 11.91% and the NASDAQ is down 5.38%.
Last week?s
tax cut has apparently been good news for the market, but I, for one,
particularly being a tax attorney don?t quite understand why.
Historically, when stocks go up bonds go down. They generally
travel in inverse ranges. Yet, many days, we are actually seeing
stocks and bonds both rising. Stocks rose for a fifth consecutive
day, sending the NASDAQ to a one-year high and the S & P 500 to
a nine-month peak. The Dow is at levels it hasn?t seen since
mid-January. Further, key executives of Microsoft and Dell
are selling shares in record amounts. Why the confusion?
Let us take
a look at the technical issues in today?s environment. On a
valuation basis, remember value stocks were the big buzzwords the last
few years, the large cap indexes appear to many market forecasters to
appear expensive. For example, the large caps of the Standard
and Poor?s Industrials are trading for about 25 times earnings.
This type of valuation level does not normally occur at market bottoms.
This may mean that even at current depressed levels, the market is still
overvalued. Yet the market has been reaching 2003 new highs.
Unemployment
claims are high. Additionally they continue to rise. There
doesn?t seem to be any fundamental reasons for the market rallying.
Yet, many economists see the economy as improving and believe the Federal
Open Market Committee is likely to ease short-term interest rates.
The federal fund rates are so low at this point, a four-decade low.
How much lower can they go? Many money market funds may be put
out of business if the funds rate gets reduced even lower, as their
real rate of return minus expenses would not allow them to keep a one
dollar per share value. Remember what I said about unemployment?
Initial claims are above 400,000 for fourteen consecutive weeks, capacity
utilization is at a twenty-year low, if the economy is growing it most
assuredly is not robust growth.
Many corporate
profits are occurring by laying people off, reducing office space and
cutting costs. They are not being achieved by real growth of many
entities.
Enough of the
technical analysis, what about the tax cuts? The true benefit
for the market, particularly for the short-range appears to be in high
dividend yielding stocks. As we have previously reported in other
columns the strategy of buying dividend-yielding stocks, combined with
selling covered calls will receive the largest benefit from this tax
act. What has occurred is a reduction in the rate of taxation
on dividends as well capital gains. Therefore, a dividend yield,
presuming you qualify for the fine print and are in a top tax bracket
would be taxed at 15%, the federal taxation bond yield would be taxed
on the top tax bracket of 35%. What does this mean for you?
Investment
$10,000 $10,000
Yield 5% 5%
Annual income $500 $500
Federal tax $75 $175
Yield $425 $325
Based upon
the foregoing, it would appear that a comparable dividend yield has
a dramatic effect for people in the top tax bracket.
Further, let?s
add to this scenario utilization that we discussed in our last column
of writing covered call options. If we presume a covered call
option on the stock of Exxon, the stock is currently selling for 37
per share and the option premium for a January 2004, $35 call option
is 3.70. The dividend yield is 2.677%. Let?s
take a look at our charts
Investment
$10,000 $10,000
Yield 2.67% 5%
Annual income $267 $500
Federal tax $40 $175
Net $237 $325
Effective Yield 2.37% 3.25%
Option Premium
(Net of share
loss of $2) 170
Income Tax
-60
Net Yield Option
110
Net Yield Option
6 months
(Annualize)
110
Net Yield Dividend 237
Total Return $457 $325
This shows
that based upon the new tax, if one is to take a strategy of buying
a well diversified portfolio of moderate dividend paying stocks, writing
covered calls they can not only protect some downside risks, but also
obtain an income stream that has favorable income tax rates. One
should not abandon bonds but must diversify by taking into effect
the tax income tax and covered call writing. (Note: Exxon
was not used as a method of recommending its stock just an example of
a large company with a gross dividend barely 53% of the bond example
noted above).
Tax wise, other
strategies are to look into mutual funds that have that have large accumulated
capital losses that they have not yet distributed. Buying into
such a mutual fund would allow you to receive distributions that do
not have any taxation relative to their capital gains. Their
gains would net against their losses. There are Internet sites
that track the mutual fund status so that you can also look at this
strategy as well.
The new tax
act will favor stocks over bonds. By selling covered calls and
diversifying your portfolio you can help protect against some downside
risk. The key is to keep a diversified income producing portfolio
and keep repeating the call writing strategy.
Retirement
style investing still requires one to diversify their portfolio and
maintain a balance. Therefore, one may wish to consider adding
bonds into their retirement accounts since they are not currently taxed,
whereas having a heavier concentration of dividend paying stocks in
their non-retirement accounts, where income tax is due. Remember,
that income taxation is an important of one?s net yield.
It isn?t the gross number on top; it is how much of that number remains
in your pocket that counts.
I can?t give
you predictions on where the market will go, but I can tell you that
tax legislation and income taxes affect the market every single year.
With the new tax act, dividend-paying stocks will become more popular
than ever.
|