|
INCOME
TAX UPDATES
BY
RICHARD M. COLOMBIK,
JD., CPA
RICHARD M. COLOMBIK
& ASSOCIATES, P.C.
COLOMBIK?S
LATE BREAKING TAX TIPS
HOT CLUB
COOLS OFF IRS
In Marlar,
Inc. v. United States, 70 Aftr. 2d. 96-6046, an adult entertainment
club owner
was granted
a refund of Employment Taxes pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provision,
Section 530 regarding independent contractors versus employees.
The club owner alleged that the dancers hired by the club were, in fact,
lessees who paid rent to the club owner for reduced shifts and did not
receive wages. They did receive money paid for the drinks, as
well as tips that they earned. Evidence was introduced to show
that a substantial segment of the adult entertainment industry treated
dancers as lessees. Therefore, summary judgment was granted that
the club fell within the Safe Harbor and the dancers were not employees.
DOCTOR CAN?T
CLAIM HE FORGOT
In Korshin
vs. Commissioner, 78 Aftr. 2d. 96-6056, an anesthesiologist had
not filed tax returns or paid his income tax for six consecutive years.
The doctor came under criminal investigation for his failure to file
and he then filed his income tax. The government asserted negligence
penalties for the failure to file and pay. The doctor asserted
that he believed his deductible expenses would exceed his income and,
therefore, the IRS would bill him for his debt. The court determined
that this belief was not reasonable and did not rebut the determination
of negligence.
1099?S
TO INCLUDE PHONE NUMBER
The Taxpayer
Bill of Rights requires payee?s statements, 1099, 1098, W2-G, etc.,
to include a phone number to provide access to a person who can answer
questions about the statement. The new requirement applies to
payee statements due by January 31st, 1997. Because
the requirement was enacted after the 1996 information returns were
printed, the IRS is waiving penalties that would otherwise apply for
failure to include a phone number. The waiver only applies if
the return filer includes the phone number on the next statement required
to be filed, generally, 1997, due in 1998.
TAXPAYER
LOSES FOR RELYING ON IRS
In Elgart
& Glassman vs. Commissioner, TCM 379, a Tax Court petition
was dismissed because it was not timely filed. That, in and of
itself, does not make one take notice. What occurred, however,
is the taxpayers requested the IRS to inform them what was the last
date they could file their Tax Court petition and still have it be ?timely
filed?. The IRS on two occasions informed the taxpayers that
the final date for filing was March 14th, 1996. The
taxpayers filed their petition by U. S. Mail on March 14th,
1996. The IRS moved to dismiss the case because the actual deadline
for filing was March 13th, 1996.
The court noted
that the IRS cannot waive jurisdictional requirements and jurisdiction
cannot be established by estoppel. Therefore, even though the
taxpayer relied on IRS employees, the Tax Court was without jurisdiction
to hear the case.
The moral of
the story, contact your tax lawyer and have your tax lawyer determine
when your petition is due. If your attorney errs, you may have
recourse. If the IRS errs in many cases, you don?t.
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
Richard
M. Colombik is a tax partner in the Des Plaines headquartered firm of
Richard M. Colombik & Associates, P.C. Mr. Colombik concentrates
his practice on IRS Tax Defense, Estate Planning and Asset Protection
Plans for individuals as well as corporate clients. He received
his B.S. Degree in Business from the University of Colorado and his
J.D., Cum Laude, from the John Marshall Law School. He is also
a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Colombik has spoken at numerous
engagements and is a well publicized author regarding Income Tax, Estate
Tax and Asset Protection Planning. He is currently a member of
the Illinois State Bar Association?s Trust and Estate Section Council,
an officer in the Northwest Suburban Bar Association and the American
Association of Attorney CPAs, as well as a member in the Offshore Institute
and the State Bar?s liaison to the Internal Revenue Service and the
past Chair of the ISBA Federal Taxation Section Council.
|